Article · 2023 Deep GEO

Atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability quantification system for clinical and biological interpretability

iScience

Full Authors

  1. Ge Zhang
  2. Xiaolin Cui
  3. Zhen Qin
  4. Zeyu Wang
  5. Yongzheng Lu
  6. Yanyan Xu
  7. Shuai Xu
  8. Laiyi Tang
  9. Li Zhang
  10. Gangqiong Liu
  11. Xiaofang Wang
  12. Jinying Zhang
  13. Junnan Tang

Official Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction dominates coronary artery disease mortality. Identifying bio-signatures for plaque destabilization and rupture is important for preventing the transition from coronary stability to instability and the occurrence of thrombosis events. This computational systems biology study enrolled 2,235 samples from 22 independent bulks cohorts and 14 samples from two single-cell cohorts. A machine-learning integrative program containing nine learners was developed to generate a warning classifier linked to atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability signature (APVS). The classifier displays the reliable performance and robustness for distinguishing ST-elevation myocardial infarction from chronic coronary syndrome at presentation, and revealed higher accuracy to 33 pathogenic biomarkers. We also developed an APVS-based quantification system (APVSLevel) for comprehensively quantifying atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability, empowering early-warning capabilities, and accurate assessment of atherosclerosis severity. It unraveled the multidimensional dysregulated mechanisms at high resolution. This study provides a potential tool for macro-level differential diagnosis and evaluation of subtle genetic pathological changes in atherosclerosis.

Text reproduced verbatim from PMC (source); DOI; CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0.

Cite this paper

Plain citation

Ge Zhang, Xiaolin Cui, Zhen Qin, Zeyu Wang, Yongzheng Lu, Yanyan Xu, Shuai Xu, Laiyi Tang, Li Zhang, Gangqiong Liu, Xiaofang Wang, Jinying Zhang, Junnan Tang. Atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability quantification system for clinical and biological interpretability. iScience. 2023;26(9):107587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107587

Author-controlled citation; verify against the publisher version of record.

Evidence Scale

APVS / APVSLevel: machine-learning and single-cell quantification of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability

A multicohort transcriptomic and single-cell framework that derives a 14-gene machine-learning signature and APVSLevel system for classification, quantification, and biological interpretation of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability.

bulk transcriptomic cohorts
22
bulk samples reported in Summary
2,235
single-cell cohorts
2
single-cell samples reported in Summary
14
GSE159677 single-cell scale
43,964 cells from 3 atherosclerotic cores and 3 adjacent normal tissues
GSE184073 single-cell scale
2,237 cells from plaques of 3 STEMI and 4 CCS patients

Counting note

The publication reports 2,235 samples from 22 bulk cohorts and 14 samples from two single-cell cohorts in the Summary, while detailed single-cell analyses describe 3 atherosclerotic cores plus 3 adjacent normal tissues and plaques from 3 STEMI plus 4 CCS patients. These modality-specific counts are preserved as reported and are not combined into a derived unique-participant total.

Research Question

Can an integrative machine-learning and transcriptomic framework identify a robust molecular signature of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability and quantify the transition from stable to unstable disease across bulk and single-cell resolution?

Author Evidence Summary

APVS is a transcriptome-based molecular signature developed to characterize atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability across multiple stages of coronary artery disease. The study integrated 22 bulk transcriptomic cohorts with two single-cell RNA-sequencing cohorts and used a nine-learner machine-learning framework to reduce 96 dysregulated co-expression pattern genes to a 14-gene atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability signature. The APVS classifier discriminated clinically and pathologically distinct states, including STEMI versus chronic coronary syndrome, advanced versus early atherosclerotic plaque, and ruptured versus stable plaque, across multiple independent datasets. To extend classification toward biological and clinical interpretation, the study developed APVSLevel, a continuous quantification system associated with coronary stenosis, major adverse cardiovascular events, plaque inflammatory activity, and cellular remodeling. Single-cell analyses linked higher APVSLevel to vulnerable plaque states, inflammatory macrophage programs, and altered macrophage-myofibroblast communication. These results support APVS/APVSLevel as a research framework for molecular characterization and risk stratification of plaque vulnerability; prospective clinical validation remains necessary before routine clinical use.

Key Findings

KF1 The integrative machine-learning program reduced 96 dysregulated co-expression pattern genes to a 14-gene APVS signature.

APVS generation and model selection across nine classical machine-learning learners

Evidence for KF1
MeasureValue
candidate DCPGs96
machine-learning learners9
selected APVS genes14
optimal learnersrandom forest and backpropagation neural network
learner evaluation10-fold cross-validation with 100 repetitions
feature selectionRF-RFE with 10-fold, 10-repeated cross-validation

Source locator: Results: Machine learning-based integrative program generates APVS; Fig. 2A-E; Methods: APVS generated from an integrative program

Permalink to KF1

KF2 The APVS classifier showed strong discrimination across independent datasets spanning clinical and pathological atherosclerotic states.

Independent external validation of STEMI/CCS, plaque-stage, plaque-rupture, and STEMI/healthy comparisons

Evidence for KF2
MeasureValue
GSE59867 STEMI vs CCS AUC0.985
GSE62646 STEMI vs CCS AUC0.997
GSE28829 advanced vs early plaque AUC0.952
GSE41571 ruptured vs stable plaque AUC0.972
GSE48060 STEMI vs healthy AUC0.871
GSE60993 STEMI vs healthy AUC0.916
GSE141512 STEMI vs healthy AUC1.000

Source locator: Results: Robust performance of APVS-based classifier; Fig. S2B and Fig. 3A-B

Permalink to KF2

KF3 Higher APVSLevel was associated with worse cardiovascular prognosis and greater coronary atherosclerotic severity.

Clinical interpretability analyses across MACE and coronary stenosis datasets

Evidence for KF3
MeasureValue
MACE associationHR 3.819; p<0.01
high vs low APVSLevel MACE incidencelog-rank p<0.01
APVSLevel vs coronary stenosis degreep<0.001
APVSLevel vs Duke CAD Indexp<0.01

Source locator: Results: The clinical interpretability underlying APVSLevel; Fig. 4A-D and Fig. 4J

Permalink to KF3

KF4 APVSLevel reproduced plaque-vulnerability differences at single-cell resolution.

Two single-cell RNA-sequencing cohorts comparing atherosclerotic core with adjacent normal tissue and vulnerable STEMI plaques with stable CCS plaques

Evidence for KF4
MeasureValue
GSE159677 cells43,964
atherosclerotic core vs adjacent normal APVSLevelhigher in atherosclerotic core; p<0.0001
GSE184073 cells2,237
vulnerable STEMI vs stable CCS plaque APVSLevelhigher in vulnerable STEMI plaques; p<0.0001

Source locator: Results: Single-cell resolution interpretation of the biological significance of APVSLevel; Fig. 7A-B and Fig. S13A

Permalink to KF4

KF5 High plaque vulnerability was linked to inflammatory macrophage states and loss of plaque-stabilizing fibrotic macrophage phenotypes.

Single-cell macrophage-state analysis in vulnerable STEMI versus stable CCS plaques

Evidence for KF5
MeasureValue
CXCL3+/IL1B+ inflammatory macrophageshigher APVSLevel in STEMI plaques
C1Q+ fibrotic macrophageslower APVSLevel in STEMI plaques
APVSLevel-high atherosclerotic coremore monocyte/macrophage and endothelial cells; fewer myofibroblast and SMC populations

Source locator: Results: Single-cell resolution interpretation; Fig. 7C-E and Fig. S14

Permalink to KF5

KF6 APVSLevel-high plaques showed a more inflammatory, procoagulant, and matrix-destabilizing molecular state, whereas APVSLevel-low plaques were relatively stromal-rich and fibrotic.

Bulk and single-cell pathway-level biological interpretation

Evidence for KF6
MeasureValue
APVSLevel-high pathwayscoagulation cascade, collagen degradation, Notch signaling, TLR signaling
APVSLevel-high cell programsinflammatory response, granulocyte activation, macrophage M1 polarization
APVSLevel-low phenotypestromal-rich, fibroblast migration, fibrous content, relative immune suppression
single-cell high-vulnerability programscoagulation, hypoxia, TNF signaling, heme metabolism, oxidative stress, senescence, DNA damage

Source locator: Results: The biological implications underlying APVSLevel; Fig. 5, Fig. S6-S8, Fig. 7E, and Fig. S14D-E

Permalink to KF6

KF7 Plaque vulnerability was accompanied by remodeling of macrophage-myofibroblast communication networks.

CellChat and NicheNet analyses of APVSLevel-high versus APVSLevel-low atherosclerotic core states

Evidence for KF7
MeasureValue
pro-inflammatory signalingMIF and VCAM strengthened in APVSLevel-high states
profibrogenic signalingSPP1 and FN1 reduced in APVSLevel-high states
Mono/Mac-directed ligand-target axesIL34/CTSK; IL6/SOCS3; AGT/SPP1; APOE/SPP1
myofibroblast-directed ligand-target axesCXCL2/CDKN1A; ADM/CCL2; NRG1/FOS; ITGB2/CCL2

Source locator: Results: Intercellular crosstalk within the atherosclerotic core was remodeled by APVS; Fig. 7F-K and Fig. S15-S16

Permalink to KF7

Study Design & Model Development

Study profile

Study Design
Retrospective multicohort computational systems biology study
Evidence Type
Bulk transcriptomics, single-cell RNA sequencing, machine learning, and clinical association analyses
Population
Atherosclerotic and coronary artery disease samples spanning stable and unstable clinical and pathological states
Primary Endpoint
Discrimination of atherosclerotic and coronary pathological states using the APVS classifier
Secondary Endpoint
Clinical and biological quantification of plaque vulnerability using APVSLevel
External dataset evaluation
Yes

Data modalities

  • bulk transcriptomics
  • single-cell RNA sequencing
  • clinical outcomes
  • coronary stenosis phenotypes

Model development

Candidate Dcpgs
96
Algorithms
9
Learner Evaluation
10-fold cross-validation with 100 repetitions
Optimal Learners
random forest, backpropagation neural network
Feature selection
Random-forest recursive feature elimination with Gini-based importance and 10-fold, 10-repeated cross-validation
Signature Size
14
Classifier
Backpropagation neural network
Quantification System
APVSLevel
Quantification Basis
APVS expression profile combined with principal-coordinate information

What This Study Adds

  • A molecular plaque-vulnerability framework derived from transcriptomic disease states rather than relying only on conventional epidemiological risk factors.
  • Cross-condition validation across STEMI versus CCS, advanced versus early plaque, ruptured versus stable plaque, and STEMI versus healthy comparisons.
  • A transition from binary classification with APVS to continuous biological and clinical quantification with APVSLevel.
  • Bulk-to-single-cell interpretation linking the same vulnerability framework to plaque microenvironment and cellular-state remodeling.
  • Mechanistic hypothesis generation through pathway, immune-landscape, and cell-cell communication analyses.

Evidence Scope

Supports

  • APVS discriminates several studied coronary and plaque pathological states in retrospective transcriptomic datasets.
  • APVSLevel is associated with plaque vulnerability, coronary stenosis severity, and MACE risk in the studied cohorts.
  • APVSLevel-high states exhibit stronger inflammatory, immune, procoagulant, and plaque-destabilizing molecular programs.
  • Single-cell datasets support APVSLevel as a molecular descriptor of vulnerable plaque biology and cellular-state remodeling.
  • APVS/APVSLevel can serve as a research framework for molecular stratification and mechanistic exploration of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability.

Does Not Establish

  • That APVS is a clinically approved diagnostic test for plaque vulnerability.
  • That the 14 APVS genes are causal drivers of plaque rupture.
  • That APVSLevel-guided treatment reduces myocardial infarction, mortality, or other clinical events.
  • That transcriptomic APVS/APVSLevel can replace coronary imaging, cardiac biomarkers, or standard clinical assessment.
  • That retrospective public-dataset validation is equivalent to prospective multicenter clinical validation.
  • That drug-response or signature-reversal analyses constitute therapeutic recommendations.

Limitations

  • The study was based predominantly on retrospective public high-throughput datasets.
  • Prospective multicenter studies are required to confirm the biological and clinical interpretability of APVSLevel.
  • The APVS classifier requires further direct comparison with established clinical biomarkers.
  • The functions of many APVS-related molecules remain incompletely established and require additional in vivo and in vitro validation.
  • Incomplete clinical and molecular traits in source datasets may obscure associations between APVS and some relevant factors.

When This Study Is Useful to Cite

  1. CU1: What transcriptomic machine-learning signatures have been developed to characterize atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability?

    APVS is a 14-gene signature derived from a 96-gene candidate set using a nine-learner machine-learning framework.

    Evidence: KF1

  2. CU2: Can APVS distinguish different clinical and pathological atherosclerotic states across independent datasets?

    The classifier was evaluated for STEMI versus CCS, advanced versus early plaque, ruptured versus stable plaque, and STEMI versus healthy comparisons.

    Evidence: KF2

  3. CU3: Is APVSLevel associated with cardiovascular prognosis and coronary atherosclerotic severity?

    Higher APVSLevel was associated with MACE risk, coronary stenosis and Duke CAD Index in the analyzed retrospective datasets.

    Evidence: KF3

  4. CU4: Which single-cell states are associated with higher molecular plaque vulnerability?

    Single-cell analyses associated higher APVSLevel with vulnerable plaque states and inflammatory macrophage programs.

    Evidence: KF4, KF5

  5. CU5: How does plaque vulnerability relate to macrophage-myofibroblast communication?

    APVSLevel-high and APVSLevel-low states showed differing inflammatory, profibrogenic and ligand-target communication patterns.

    Evidence: KF7

What This Study Should Not Be Cited to Claim

  • An approved clinical diagnostic test for plaque vulnerability.
  • Causal roles for the 14 APVS genes.
  • Prospective multicenter clinical validation.
  • APVSLevel-guided treatment reduces MI, mortality or other events.
  • Transcriptomic APVS replaces plaque imaging, biomarkers or standard clinical assessment.
  • Signature-reversal or drug-response analyses constitute treatment recommendations.

Evidence Matrix

Row IDComponentContextFindingEvidence LevelScopeSource LocatorEvidence refs
evidence-apvs-developmentAPVS signature developmentAPVS generation and model selection across nine classical machine-learning learnersThe integrative machine-learning program reduced 96 dysregulated co-expression pattern genes to a 14-gene APVS signature. candidate DCPGs: 96; machine-learning learners: 9; selected APVS genes: 14; optimal learners: random forest and backpropagation neural network; learner evaluation: 10-fold cross-validation with 100 repetitions; feature selection: RF-RFE with 10-fold, 10-repeated cross-validation.Retrospective multicohort machine-learning developmentMolecular signature derivation, not clinical diagnostic approval.Results: Machine learning-based integrative program generates APVS; Fig. 2A-E; Methods: APVS generated from an integrative programKF1
evidence-multicohort-discriminationMulticohort discriminationIndependent external validation of STEMI/CCS, plaque-stage, plaque-rupture, and STEMI/healthy comparisonsThe APVS classifier showed strong discrimination across independent datasets spanning clinical and pathological atherosclerotic states. GSE59867 STEMI vs CCS AUC: 0.985; GSE62646 STEMI vs CCS AUC: 0.997; GSE28829 advanced vs early plaque AUC: 0.952; GSE41571 ruptured vs stable plaque AUC: 0.972; GSE48060 STEMI vs healthy AUC: 0.871; GSE60993 STEMI vs healthy AUC: 0.916; GSE141512 STEMI vs healthy AUC: 1.000.Independent retrospective dataset classificationDataset discrimination, not prospective clinical validation.Results: Robust performance of APVS-based classifier; Fig. S2B and Fig. 3A-BKF2
evidence-clinical-associationClinical associationClinical interpretability analyses across MACE and coronary stenosis datasetsHigher APVSLevel was associated with worse cardiovascular prognosis and greater coronary atherosclerotic severity. MACE association: HR 3.819; p<0.01; high vs low APVSLevel MACE incidence: log-rank p<0.01; APVSLevel vs coronary stenosis degree: p<0.001; APVSLevel vs Duke CAD Index: p<0.01.Retrospective clinical associationAssociation, not evidence that APVSLevel-guided treatment improves outcomes.Results: The clinical interpretability underlying APVSLevel; Fig. 4A-D and Fig. 4JKF3
evidence-single-cell-validationSingle-cell validationTwo single-cell RNA-sequencing cohorts comparing atherosclerotic core with adjacent normal tissue and vulnerable STEMI plaques with stable CCS plaquesAPVSLevel reproduced plaque-vulnerability differences at single-cell resolution. GSE159677 cells: 43,964; atherosclerotic core vs adjacent normal APVSLevel: higher in atherosclerotic core; p<0.0001; GSE184073 cells: 2,237; vulnerable STEMI vs stable CCS plaque APVSLevel: higher in vulnerable STEMI plaques; p<0.0001.Single-cell observational associationSingle-cell plaque-state contrast, not causal validation.Results: Single-cell resolution interpretation of the biological significance of APVSLevel; Fig. 7A-B and Fig. S13AKF4
evidence-macrophage-stateInflammatory macrophage stateSingle-cell macrophage-state analysis in vulnerable STEMI versus stable CCS plaquesHigh plaque vulnerability was linked to inflammatory macrophage states and loss of plaque-stabilizing fibrotic macrophage phenotypes. CXCL3+/IL1B+ inflammatory macrophages: higher APVSLevel in STEMI plaques; C1Q+ fibrotic macrophages: lower APVSLevel in STEMI plaques; APVSLevel-high atherosclerotic core: more monocyte/macrophage and endothelial cells; fewer myofibroblast and SMC populations.Single-cell cell-state associationMacrophage-state association, not a proven therapeutic mechanism.Results: Single-cell resolution interpretation; Fig. 7C-E and Fig. S14KF5
evidence-biological-stateBiological plaque stateBulk and single-cell pathway-level biological interpretationAPVSLevel-high plaques showed a more inflammatory, procoagulant, and matrix-destabilizing molecular state, whereas APVSLevel-low plaques were relatively stromal-rich and fibrotic. APVSLevel-high pathways: coagulation cascade, collagen degradation, Notch signaling, TLR signaling; APVSLevel-high cell programs: inflammatory response, granulocyte activation, macrophage M1 polarization; APVSLevel-low phenotype: stromal-rich, fibroblast migration, fibrous content, relative immune suppression; single-cell high-vulnerability programs: coagulation, hypoxia, TNF signaling, heme metabolism, oxidative stress, senescence, DNA damage.Bulk and single-cell pathway associationBiological interpretation, not treatment recommendation.Results: The biological implications underlying APVSLevel; Fig. 5, Fig. S6-S8, Fig. 7E, and Fig. S14D-EKF6
evidence-cell-communicationMacrophage-myofibroblast communicationCellChat and NicheNet analyses of APVSLevel-high versus APVSLevel-low atherosclerotic core statesPlaque vulnerability was accompanied by remodeling of macrophage-myofibroblast communication networks. pro-inflammatory signaling: MIF and VCAM strengthened in APVSLevel-high states; profibrogenic signaling: SPP1 and FN1 reduced in APVSLevel-high states; Mono/Mac-directed ligand-target axes: IL34/CTSK; IL6/SOCS3; AGT/SPP1; APOE/SPP1; myofibroblast-directed ligand-target axes: CXCL2/CDKN1A; ADM/CCL2; NRG1/FOS; ITGB2/CCL2.Computational ligand-receptor inferenceInferred communication differences, not clinical intervention efficacy.Results: Intercellular crosstalk within the atherosclerotic core was remodeled by APVS; Fig. 7F-K and Fig. S15-S16KF7

Q&A

What is APVS?

APVS is a 14-gene atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability signature derived from 96 dysregulated co-expression pattern genes using an integrative nine-learner machine-learning framework.

Evidence: KF1

Can APVS distinguish STEMI from chronic coronary syndrome?

Yes. The APVS classifier achieved AUCs of 0.985 in GSE59867 and 0.997 in GSE62646 for STEMI versus chronic coronary syndrome classification.

Evidence: KF2

Can APVS distinguish ruptured from stable atherosclerotic plaques?

Yes. In GSE41571, the APVS classifier achieved an AUC of 0.972 for ruptured versus stable plaque classification.

Evidence: KF2

Can APVS distinguish advanced from early atherosclerotic plaques?

Yes. In GSE28829, the APVS classifier achieved an AUC of 0.952 for advanced versus early-stage plaque classification.

Evidence: KF2

What is APVSLevel?

APVSLevel is a continuous molecular quantification system derived from the APVS expression profile and principal-coordinate information to represent atherosclerosis severity and plaque vulnerability.

Evidence: KF3, KF4

Is APVSLevel associated with cardiovascular outcomes and disease severity?

Yes. Higher APVSLevel was associated with increased MACE risk (HR 3.819, p<0.01), greater coronary stenosis (p<0.001), and a higher Duke Coronary Artery Disease Index (p<0.01).

Evidence: KF3

What single-cell states are associated with high atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability?

Higher APVSLevel was associated with vulnerable plaque microenvironments enriched in inflammatory monocyte/macrophage programs, including CXCL3+/IL1B+ macrophage states, while C1Q+ fibrotic plaque-stabilizing macrophage phenotypes showed lower APVSLevel in STEMI plaques.

Evidence: KF4, KF5

Is APVS or APVSLevel ready to replace clinical plaque assessment?

No. The evidence is primarily retrospective and transcriptomics-based. Prospective multicenter validation, direct comparison with established clinical biomarkers, and additional experimental validation are required before clinical translation.

Concepts & Entities

Conditions

atherosclerosiscoronary artery diseaseacute myocardial infarctionST-elevation myocardial infarctionchronic coronary syndromeacute coronary syndrome

Plaque Phenotypes

atherosclerotic plaque vulnerabilitystable plaqueruptured plaqueearly-stage plaqueadvanced plaqueatherosclerotic corefibrous plaque

Outcomes

major adverse cardiovascular eventscoronary stenosisplaque rupturerestenosis after PCI

Methods

machine learningrandom forestbackpropagation neural networkrecursive feature eliminationweighted gene co-expression network analysisprincipal coordinates analysissingle-cell RNA sequencinggene set enrichment analysisgene set variation analysisDIRACVissExCellCellChatNicheNetSubclass Mapping

Models & Tools

APVSAPVS classifierAPVSLevel

Cell Types

monocyte/macrophagevascular smooth muscle cellmyofibroblastendothelial cellB cellplasma cellmast cellneutrophilfoam cell

Pathways Processes

inflammationcoagulationextracellular matrix degradationfibrosisoxidative stresscellular senescenceDNA damageNotch signalingTLR signalingTNF signalingheme metabolismcholesterol homeostasis

Mechanistic Entities

CXCL3IL1BC1QIL34CTSKIL6SOCS3AGTSPP1APOECXCL2CDKN1AADMCCL2NRG1FOSITGB2FN1MIFVCAM

Datasets & Cohorts

GSE59867GSE62646GSE28829GSE41571GSE48060GSE60993GSE141512GSE21545GSE159677GSE184073

Related Research

Publication & Provenance

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107587
Publisher
https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(23)01664-4
PubMed
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37664595/
PMCID
PMC10470306
Code
https://github.com/DrZoggg/APVS
Evidence Basis
Version of record and PMC full text
Author-controlled evidence page for this publication. This page provides an evidence-oriented summary and does not replace the publisher's version of record.

Study-level evidence table

Study-level author-maintained evidence summary. Not participant-level data and not a ready-to-pool meta-analysis dataset. For formal citation, use the original article DOI.

Download study-level evidence CSV (UTF-8)

Formula safety: cells starting with =, +, -, @ (after leading whitespace), or tab/CR/LF are prefixed with an apostrophe. Treat all cells as text; remove only that safety prefix when recovering the original string.

Verify publication identity

These records identify the same original work; database inclusion is not evidence of scientific validity or clinical benefit.