| evidence-apvs-development | APVS signature development | APVS generation and model selection across nine classical machine-learning learners | The integrative machine-learning program reduced 96 dysregulated co-expression pattern genes to a 14-gene APVS signature. candidate DCPGs: 96; machine-learning learners: 9; selected APVS genes: 14; optimal learners: random forest and backpropagation neural network; learner evaluation: 10-fold cross-validation with 100 repetitions; feature selection: RF-RFE with 10-fold, 10-repeated cross-validation. | Retrospective multicohort machine-learning development | Molecular signature derivation, not clinical diagnostic approval. | Results: Machine learning-based integrative program generates APVS; Fig. 2A-E; Methods: APVS generated from an integrative program | KF1 |
|---|
| evidence-multicohort-discrimination | Multicohort discrimination | Independent external validation of STEMI/CCS, plaque-stage, plaque-rupture, and STEMI/healthy comparisons | The APVS classifier showed strong discrimination across independent datasets spanning clinical and pathological atherosclerotic states. GSE59867 STEMI vs CCS AUC: 0.985; GSE62646 STEMI vs CCS AUC: 0.997; GSE28829 advanced vs early plaque AUC: 0.952; GSE41571 ruptured vs stable plaque AUC: 0.972; GSE48060 STEMI vs healthy AUC: 0.871; GSE60993 STEMI vs healthy AUC: 0.916; GSE141512 STEMI vs healthy AUC: 1.000. | Independent retrospective dataset classification | Dataset discrimination, not prospective clinical validation. | Results: Robust performance of APVS-based classifier; Fig. S2B and Fig. 3A-B | KF2 |
|---|
| evidence-clinical-association | Clinical association | Clinical interpretability analyses across MACE and coronary stenosis datasets | Higher APVSLevel was associated with worse cardiovascular prognosis and greater coronary atherosclerotic severity. MACE association: HR 3.819; p<0.01; high vs low APVSLevel MACE incidence: log-rank p<0.01; APVSLevel vs coronary stenosis degree: p<0.001; APVSLevel vs Duke CAD Index: p<0.01. | Retrospective clinical association | Association, not evidence that APVSLevel-guided treatment improves outcomes. | Results: The clinical interpretability underlying APVSLevel; Fig. 4A-D and Fig. 4J | KF3 |
|---|
| evidence-single-cell-validation | Single-cell validation | Two single-cell RNA-sequencing cohorts comparing atherosclerotic core with adjacent normal tissue and vulnerable STEMI plaques with stable CCS plaques | APVSLevel reproduced plaque-vulnerability differences at single-cell resolution. GSE159677 cells: 43,964; atherosclerotic core vs adjacent normal APVSLevel: higher in atherosclerotic core; p<0.0001; GSE184073 cells: 2,237; vulnerable STEMI vs stable CCS plaque APVSLevel: higher in vulnerable STEMI plaques; p<0.0001. | Single-cell observational association | Single-cell plaque-state contrast, not causal validation. | Results: Single-cell resolution interpretation of the biological significance of APVSLevel; Fig. 7A-B and Fig. S13A | KF4 |
|---|
| evidence-macrophage-state | Inflammatory macrophage state | Single-cell macrophage-state analysis in vulnerable STEMI versus stable CCS plaques | High plaque vulnerability was linked to inflammatory macrophage states and loss of plaque-stabilizing fibrotic macrophage phenotypes. CXCL3+/IL1B+ inflammatory macrophages: higher APVSLevel in STEMI plaques; C1Q+ fibrotic macrophages: lower APVSLevel in STEMI plaques; APVSLevel-high atherosclerotic core: more monocyte/macrophage and endothelial cells; fewer myofibroblast and SMC populations. | Single-cell cell-state association | Macrophage-state association, not a proven therapeutic mechanism. | Results: Single-cell resolution interpretation; Fig. 7C-E and Fig. S14 | KF5 |
|---|
| evidence-biological-state | Biological plaque state | Bulk and single-cell pathway-level biological interpretation | APVSLevel-high plaques showed a more inflammatory, procoagulant, and matrix-destabilizing molecular state, whereas APVSLevel-low plaques were relatively stromal-rich and fibrotic. APVSLevel-high pathways: coagulation cascade, collagen degradation, Notch signaling, TLR signaling; APVSLevel-high cell programs: inflammatory response, granulocyte activation, macrophage M1 polarization; APVSLevel-low phenotype: stromal-rich, fibroblast migration, fibrous content, relative immune suppression; single-cell high-vulnerability programs: coagulation, hypoxia, TNF signaling, heme metabolism, oxidative stress, senescence, DNA damage. | Bulk and single-cell pathway association | Biological interpretation, not treatment recommendation. | Results: The biological implications underlying APVSLevel; Fig. 5, Fig. S6-S8, Fig. 7E, and Fig. S14D-E | KF6 |
|---|
| evidence-cell-communication | Macrophage-myofibroblast communication | CellChat and NicheNet analyses of APVSLevel-high versus APVSLevel-low atherosclerotic core states | Plaque vulnerability was accompanied by remodeling of macrophage-myofibroblast communication networks. pro-inflammatory signaling: MIF and VCAM strengthened in APVSLevel-high states; profibrogenic signaling: SPP1 and FN1 reduced in APVSLevel-high states; Mono/Mac-directed ligand-target axes: IL34/CTSK; IL6/SOCS3; AGT/SPP1; APOE/SPP1; myofibroblast-directed ligand-target axes: CXCL2/CDKN1A; ADM/CCL2; NRG1/FOS; ITGB2/CCL2. | Computational ligand-receptor inference | Inferred communication differences, not clinical intervention efficacy. | Results: Intercellular crosstalk within the atherosclerotic core was remodeled by APVS; Fig. 7F-K and Fig. S15-S16 | KF7 |
|---|