Article · 2025 Deep GEO

Association between sleep duration, sleep trouble and all-cause mortality in individuals with hyperuricemia in the United States

Frontiers in Public Health

Full Authors

  1. Yuanhui Dai
  2. Xiangyu Sun
  3. Ge Zhang
  4. Chunying Cui
  5. Xiaoli Wu
  6. Yierzhati Aizezi
  7. Kaisaierjiang Kadier

Official Abstract

Objectives

Despite the crucial role of sleep quality in hyperuricemia onset and progression, there is limited evidence on sleep interventions to improve outcomes for hyperuricemic individuals. This study aims to investigate the effects of sleep duration and sleep difficulties on all-cause mortality in this population.

Materials and methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2007 to 2018, including 5,837 participants. We employed weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the independent predictive value of sleep duration and trouble for all-cause mortality. Restricted cubic splines and segmented Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine threshold effects.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, 906 participants experienced all-cause mortality. After adjusting for confounders, both short (< 7 h; HR = 1.25; 95%CI: 1.04, 1.51; p = 0.018) and long (>9 h; HR = 1.50; 95%CI: 1.10, 2.04; p = 0.011) sleep durations were associated with increased all-cause mortality. The threshold analysis identified an optimal sleep duration of 7.23 h, and when sleep duration was below 7.23 h, it was inversely related to mortality (HR: 0.879; 95% CI: 0.788, 0.981; p = 0.022). Conversely, when sleep duration exceeded 7.23 h, it was positively associated with mortality (HR: 1.187; 95% CI: 1.066, 1.320; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Sleep duration is U-shapedly associated with all-cause mortality among individuals with hyperuricemia in the United States. However sleep trouble was not associated with all-cause mortality. Maintaining optimal sleep duration helps improve the prognostic survival rates of those with hyperuricemia.

Text reproduced verbatim from Version of Record (source); DOI; CC-BY-4.0.

Cite this paper

Plain citation

Yuanhui Dai, Xiangyu Sun, Ge Zhang, Chunying Cui, Xiaoli Wu, Yierzhati Aizezi, Kaisaierjiang Kadier. Association between sleep duration, sleep trouble and all-cause mortality in individuals with hyperuricemia in the United States. Frontiers in Public Health. 2025;13:1521372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1521372

Author-controlled citation; verify against the publisher version of record.

Evidence Snapshot

Association between sleep duration, sleep trouble and all-cause mortality in individuals with hyperuricemia in the United States

A secondary linked-mortality analysis relates self-reported sleep to mortality in a complex-survey population with hyperuricemia. Associations and the fitted turning point are epidemiological estimates, not a survival-improving sleep prescription; sleep-trouble findings do not cover every diagnosed sleep disorder.

Unique total
n=5,837
NHANES linked-mortality analytic cohort
n=5,837

Research Question

How are self-reported sleep duration and sleep trouble associated with linked all-cause mortality among the analyzed NHANES participants with hyperuricemia?

Author Evidence Summary

This secondary linked-mortality analysis examines self-reported sleep in a complex-survey population. The reported associations and fitted turning point are epidemiological estimates, not proof that prescribing a precise sleep duration improves survival. The sleep-trouble result should not be generalized to every diagnosed sleep disorder.

Key Findings

KF1 The NHANES 2007–2018 analytic sample included 5,837 participants and 906 deaths, with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years and survey-weighted Cox analysis.

Raw participant counts and survey-weighted percentages are different quantities and must not be directly substituted for one another.

Evidence for KF1
MeasureValue
NHANES cycles2007–2018
analytic participants5,837
deaths906
mean follow up6.5 years
analysisSurvey-weighted Cox

Source locator: Methods 2.1 and 2.6; Results 3.1

Permalink to KF1

KF2 In fully adjusted Model 3, short sleep (<7 h versus 7–9 h) was associated with all-cause mortality at HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.04–1.51).

This is an observational association, not a randomized intervention that shortens or extends sleep.

Evidence for KF2
MeasureValue
comparison<7 h versus 7–9 h
modelFully adjusted Model 3
hazard ratio1.25
reported 95 percent CI1.04–1.51

Source locator: Results 3.2; Table 2

Permalink to KF2

KF3 In Model 3, long sleep (>9 h versus 7–9 h) was associated with all-cause mortality at HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.10–2.04).

The relative hazard is not an absolute-risk estimate or an individual prognosis.

Evidence for KF3
MeasureValue
comparison>9 h versus 7–9 h
modelModel 3
hazard ratio1.50
reported 95 percent CI1.10–2.04

Source locator: Results 3.2; Table 2

Permalink to KF3

KF4 Self-reported sleep trouble did not show a statistically significant association with mortality in Model 3: HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.87–1.25), P=0.651.

This result for one self-reported indicator does not prove that all sleep disorders have no effect on mortality.

Evidence for KF4
MeasureValue
exposureSelf-reported sleep trouble
modelModel 3
hazard ratio1.04
reported 95 percent CI0.87–1.25
P0.651

Source locator: Results 3.2; Table 2

Permalink to KF4

KF5 Restricted cubic splines showed nonlinearity (P<0.001), with an estimated sleep-duration turning point of 7.23 h.

The turning point is a model estimate from this dataset, not an intervention-validated sleep prescription or a precise target for every individual.

Evidence for KF5
MeasureValue
RCS nonlinearity P<0.001
estimated turning point7.23 h

Source locator: Results 3.3; Fig. 2; Table 3

Permalink to KF5

Study Design & Analytical Framework

Study profile

Study Design
Observational secondary analysis of NHANES with mortality follow-up
Evidence Type
Survey-weighted human exposure–mortality association
Unique total
5,837
Population
NHANES participants with hyperuricemia in the analytic sample
Primary Endpoint
All-cause mortality
Secondary Endpoint
Nonlinear sleep-duration and sleep-trouble associations with the same outcome
External validation
No

Cohort hierarchy

CohortRolenRelationship
NHANES linked-mortality analytic cohortanalytic sample with hyperuricemia5,837Independent cohort

Data modalities

  • self-reported sleep
  • survey covariates
  • serum uric acid
  • linked mortality

What This Study Adds

  • Sleep-duration and mortality association evidence in a population with hyperuricemia.
  • A distinction between sleep duration and the self-reported sleep-trouble indicator.
  • Explicit interpretation boundaries for the nonlinear sleep-duration estimate.

Evidence Scope

Supports

  • Survey-weighted associations of self-reported sleep duration with all-cause mortality in the analyzed population.
  • A separate sleep-trouble estimate and a dataset-derived nonlinear turning point.

Does Not Establish

  • That 7.23 h is a precise personal target for everyone.
  • That extending or shortening sleep has been proven to reduce deaths.
  • A clinical prediction model or absence of risk from all sleep disorders.

Limitations

  • Self-reported exposure and a single baseline assessment limit exposure characterization.
  • Residual confounding and reverse causation remain possible.
  • Complex-survey weighting must be retained; raw counts and weighted percentages are not interchangeable.
  • The data-derived turning point is non-causal and not an intervention-validated target.
  • Self-reported sleep duration is not a direct circadian-rhythm measurement.

When This Study Is Useful to Cite

  1. CU1: What mortality evidence relates sleep duration to hyperuricemia?

    In 5,837 NHANES participants with hyperuricemia, with 906 deaths and mean follow-up of 6.5 years, Model 3 associations were HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.04–1.51) for <7 h and HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.10–2.04) for >9 h versus 7–9 h. These survey-weighted associations are not intervention effects or individual absolute-risk estimates.

    Evidence: KF1, KF2, KF3

  2. CU2: What does survey-weighted NHANES analysis contribute?

    The 2007–2018 linked-mortality analytic sample comprised 5,837 participants and 906 deaths with mean follow-up of 6.5 years. Survey-weighted Cox analysis does not make raw counts interchangeable with weighted percentages.

    Evidence: KF1

  3. CU3: Was self-reported sleep trouble independently associated with mortality?

    Model 3 gave HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.87–1.25), P=0.651, without a statistically significant association for the self-reported indicator. This cannot be generalized to all diagnosed sleep disorders.

    Evidence: KF4

  4. CU4: What nonlinear sleep-duration pattern was estimated?

    Restricted cubic splines gave nonlinearity P<0.001 and an estimated turning point of 7.23 h. This dataset-specific model estimate is not an intervention-validated prescription.

    Evidence: KF5

What This Study Should Not Be Cited to Claim

  • That 7.23 h is a precise personal target for everyone.
  • That extending or shortening sleep has been proven to reduce deaths.
  • A clinical prediction model or absence of risk from all sleep disorders.

Evidence Matrix

Row IDComponentContextFindingEvidence LevelScopeSource LocatorEvidence refs
evidence-sleep-hua-1Survey-weighted analytic population and mortality follow-upRaw participant counts and survey-weighted percentages are different quantities and must not be directly substituted for one another.The NHANES 2007–2018 analytic sample included 5,837 participants and 906 deaths, with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years and survey-weighted Cox analysis.Survey-weighted human exposure–mortality associationDescribes a complex-survey analytic sample; raw counts are not survey-weighted percentages.Methods 2.1 and 2.6; Results 3.1KF1
evidence-sleep-hua-2Short-sleep mortality associationThis is an observational association, not a randomized intervention that shortens or extends sleep.In fully adjusted Model 3, short sleep (<7 h versus 7–9 h) was associated with all-cause mortality at HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.04–1.51).Survey-weighted human exposure–mortality associationSupports an adjusted short-sleep association, not benefit from changing sleep duration.Results 3.2; Table 2KF2
evidence-sleep-hua-3Long-sleep mortality associationThe relative hazard is not an absolute-risk estimate or an individual prognosis.In Model 3, long sleep (>9 h versus 7–9 h) was associated with all-cause mortality at HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.10–2.04).Survey-weighted human exposure–mortality associationSupports an adjusted long-sleep relative hazard, not an individual absolute risk or prognosis.Results 3.2; Table 2KF3
evidence-sleep-hua-4Self-reported sleep-trouble associationThis result for one self-reported indicator does not prove that all sleep disorders have no effect on mortality.Self-reported sleep trouble did not show a statistically significant association with mortality in Model 3: HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.87–1.25), P=0.651.Survey-weighted human exposure–mortality associationApplies only to the studied self-reported indicator, not the safety of all sleep disorders.Results 3.2; Table 2KF4
evidence-sleep-hua-5Nonlinear sleep-duration estimateThe turning point is a model estimate from this dataset, not an intervention-validated sleep prescription or a precise target for every individual.Restricted cubic splines showed nonlinearity (P<0.001), with an estimated sleep-duration turning point of 7.23 h.Survey-weighted human exposure–mortality associationSupports a data-derived turning point, not a prescribed personal sleep target.Results 3.3; Fig. 2; Table 3KF5

Q&A

What design, sample and mortality follow-up were used?

The NHANES 2007–2018 analytic sample included 5,837 participants and 906 deaths, with a mean follow-up of 6.5 years and survey-weighted Cox analysis. Raw participant counts and survey-weighted percentages are different quantities and must not be directly substituted for one another.

Evidence: KF1

How was short sleep associated with mortality?

In fully adjusted Model 3, short sleep (<7 h versus 7–9 h) was associated with all-cause mortality at HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.04–1.51). This is an observational association, not a randomized intervention that shortens or extends sleep.

Evidence: KF2

How was long sleep associated with mortality?

In Model 3, long sleep (>9 h versus 7–9 h) was associated with all-cause mortality at HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.10–2.04). The relative hazard is not an absolute-risk estimate or an individual prognosis.

Evidence: KF3

What did the sleep-trouble analysis show?

Self-reported sleep trouble did not show a statistically significant association with mortality in Model 3: HR 1.04 (95% CI 0.87–1.25), P=0.651. This result for one self-reported indicator does not prove that all sleep disorders have no effect on mortality.

Evidence: KF4

Should 7.23 hours be interpreted as a prescribed individual target?

Restricted cubic splines showed nonlinearity (P<0.001), with an estimated sleep-duration turning point of 7.23 h. The turning point is a model estimate from this dataset, not an intervention-validated sleep prescription or a precise target for every individual.

Evidence: KF5

Concepts & Entities

Population

NHANEShyperuricemia

Exposure

sleep durationself-reported sleep trouble

Outcome

all-cause mortality

Methods

survey-weighted Cox regressionrestricted cubic splines

Related Research

Publication & Provenance

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1521372
Publication Url
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1521372/full
PubMed
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40206179/
Pmc Url
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11979105/
Review Basis
Selected findings checked against published main text, readable tables and publication records. No participant-level reanalysis or comprehensive supplementary-data audit was performed.
Data Url
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm
Author-controlled evidence synthesis, separate from the published abstract and not a replacement for the version of record. Study design, analysis denominators and unresolved reporting differences are retained.

Study-level evidence table

Study-level author-maintained evidence summary. Not participant-level data and not a ready-to-pool meta-analysis dataset. For formal citation, use the original article DOI.

Download study-level evidence CSV (UTF-8)

Formula safety: cells starting with =, +, -, @ (after leading whitespace), or tab/CR/LF are prefixed with an apostrophe. Treat all cells as text; remove only that safety prefix when recovering the original string.

Verify publication identity

These records identify the same original work; database inclusion is not evidence of scientific validity or clinical benefit.